Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Frank Thoughts - by reuben

Frank Thoughts - January 2007

Is your diamond conflict free?

January 26th 2007 13:10
Diamonds or the diamond industry is not all bad. But, whenever something of great value is found, many people lose their lives because of it, and diamond is no exception.

The recently released movie ‘Blood Diamond’, which stars Leonardo DiCaprio, and is set during Sierra Leone’s diamond fuelled civil war, has created a mini public relations crisis for the diamond industry. As per recent media reports A-list celebrities such as Beyoncé Knowles and Jennifer Lopez are part of a multimillion-dollar campaign by the industry to avert this disaster. Knowles and Lopez agreed to wear jewel-encrusted rings on their right hands at last week’s Golden Globe award ceremony in return for the promise from the diamond industry of $10,000 each donated to the African charity of their choice.


Other Hollywood stalwarts too are being approached to promote diamonds at the Academy Awards next month. And that’s not all, the industry’s campaign - titled ‘Raise Your Right Hand’ - does not stop at the movie industry, the industry also fears that the movie could tarnish the appeal of diamonds among bling wearing hip-hop fans. So De Beers, which has a 40 per cent share of the global diamond market, responded by enlisting the public support of the founder of Def Jam records, Russell Simmons. The movie has also provoked bitterness between the industry and pressure groups, who say the 'Raise Your Right Hand' initiative has distasteful echoes of Sierra Leone’s civil war, during which rebels used amputation to terrorise civilians. Amputation also meant that the people couldn't vote if they did not have a right hand!

The movie has done its part in generating enough awareness about conflict diamonds. Even in India, students from a Mumbai college organised a campaign to make people aware of conflict diamonds and urged them to question the source of the diamonds they buy. Though the diamond industry claims that the trade in conflict diamonds has been reduced from 4% to 1% by the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS), one can never tell if a diamond bought in the retail market is conflict-free or not. However when we buy the diamond, we can do our part by asking the retailer to confirm if the diamonds have come through the KPCS.


We can help check the trade of conflict diamonds…but for this we must be aware and ask questions.
99
Vote
   


Did they find the ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’ in Iraq? Did they “smoke out” Osama Bin Laden from Afghanistan? Have they restored democracy in Iraq or any other country they have tried to do so? Then what in god’s name making the UN Security Council fall for the United States led imposition of sanctions on Iran’s nuclear enrichment programme, even though they were invited to visit all their nuclear facilities*? (Ironically, the Iranian nuclear programme was started with US help in the 1950s during the cold war) Why are they falling for the same story again?

Speaking in the southwestern provincial capital of Ahvaz, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the Security Council’s resolution of 23 December 2006 was invalid and had left the world body’s reputation in tatters. “You are nobody,” he told the Western powers. Recalling the West’s support for Iraq, then ruled by Saddam Hussein, during its eight year war with Iran in the 1980s, he said: “If all the powers that supported Saddam in his war against Iran were to regroup and confront Iran again, Iranians would deliver a historic slap in their face.” He added that Iran had done everything it could, to prove that its nuclear programme is peaceful, but the West in the name of opposing nuclear weapons, was trying to thwart Iran’s development. “We have tried all legal, wise and logical ways to convince these corrupt and selfish powers,” he said of the West. “Let the world know that from the Iranian nation’s point of view, this resolution has no validity,” Ahmadinejad said. He said the United States was the main power behind the resolution, and warned Washington: “I want you to know that the Iranian nation has humiliated you many times, and it will humiliate you in future.”

The United Nations Security Council has become a toothless and heavily influenced organisation. They proved this last year when Israel attacked Lebanon. The council sat twiddling its thumbs even though Kofi Annan, the UN Security General pleaded with them to send in peacekeeping forces. All because the US didn’t want the war to stop, and was backing Israel. The Security Council has become terribly influenced by the more powerful members.

Today (09 Jan 2007) a US attack plane killed many people with barrages of gunfire in a remote Somali village occupied by Islamists, thought to be hiding at least ONE al Qaeda suspect. What the hell is happening in our world? In the absence of a fair and unbiased world security organisation, are we heading towards a third world war?

* The Security Council voted unanimously to bar all countries from selling materials and technology to Iran that could contribute to its nuclear and missile programmes. It also froze the assets of 10 Iranian companies and 12 individuals related to those programmes.
113
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
13 Posts dating from December 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by reuben
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]